AI & Machine Learning

AI That Ships to Production, Not Just Demos

LLM-powered products, RAG systems, custom ML pipelines, and computer vision — built for real users with real latency budgets. 15+ AI products shipped, evals in CI, monitoring in production.

15+
AI products shipped
<800ms
Avg. RAG response
94%
Eval pass rate

Why Most AI & Machine Learning Projects Underperform

The Problem

Most AI projects die between prototype and production. The demo wows the CEO; six months later there's no monitoring, no evals, hallucinations are eating customer trust, and the bill from OpenAI is three times the forecast.

Our Approach

We build AI products like we build any other production system: with evals, observability, cost monitoring, fallback paths, and an incident runbook. Prompt engineering is treated as code — versioned, tested, reviewed.

End-to-End AI & Machine Learning

Everything needed to take your project from idea to production — and keep it running.

LLM Integration

OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Llama, Mistral, Gemini. Multi-provider abstractions, fallback routing, structured outputs, function calling, streaming.

RAG Pipelines

Vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, pgvector), hybrid search (BM25 + dense), reranking, citations, chunking strategies that actually work.

Conversational AI

Customer support agents, sales assistants, internal copilots. Tool use, memory, persona consistency, guardrails against jailbreaks.

Computer Vision

Object detection, OCR, image classification, document understanding. Fine-tuning on YOLO, ViT, CLIP, Segment Anything. On-device inference where it fits.

Custom Model Training

Fine-tuning LLMs on your domain data, LoRA adapters, embedding model training, classical ML for tabular data.

AI Safety & Evals

Eval suites in CI, prompt regression tests, hallucination detection, PII redaction, jailbreak resistance, output filtering.

How a AI & Machine Learning Engagement Runs

Same playbook on every project. Predictable timeline, fixed cost, daily communication.

01

Problem Framing

Is this actually an AI problem? Sometimes a SQL query beats a fine-tuned model. We tell you honestly when AI isn't the answer.

02

Prototype & Evaluate

Build a working prototype in 2-3 weeks with a measurable eval suite. Test against baselines: GPT-4, Claude, your existing solution.

03

Productionize

Cost monitoring, latency budgets, retries, fallbacks, caching, structured logging, prompt versioning. Boring infrastructure that keeps things running.

04

Monitor & Iterate

Production evals, drift detection, user feedback loops. Models and prompts get versioned and reviewed like any other code.

Our Tech Stack

We're framework-agnostic — we pick what fits your project, your team, and your hiring market.

OpenAI
Claude API
LangChain
Pinecone
Weaviate
Python
PyTorch
Modal / Replicate

Three Things We Do Differently

01

Evals before vibes

Every LLM feature ships with a regression eval suite. We don't 'feel' that a prompt got better — we measure it.

02

Cost monitoring from day one

Per-feature, per-user cost tracking. We've cut LLM bills 60% on takeover projects through caching, model routing, and prompt compression.

03

Honest about what AI can and can't do

We'll tell you when an LLM is the wrong tool. Some things rules-engines, search, or a SQL query do better, faster, and cheaper.

What This Looks Like in Production

They shipped our RAG-based support copilot in 9 weeks. The eval suite they built is now used by our internal ML team for every prompt change. Deflection rate hit 47% in month two.
VP Engineering, B2B SaaS, Series B
47%
Ticket deflection
9 wks
Time to launch
780ms
P95 latency
-61%
LLM cost vs baseline

Common Questions

Depends on the task. Claude Sonnet/Opus for long-context reasoning, careful instruction-following, and writing tasks. GPT-4-class models for general-purpose use with strong tool calling. Open-source (Llama, Mistral, Qwen) when data residency, cost at scale, or fine-tuning are blockers. We typically build with a provider-abstraction layer so you can switch without rewriting the app.
Layered defense: grounded prompting (RAG with citations), structured outputs (JSON schemas, function calling), retrieval verification, eval suites with adversarial prompts, output filtering, and human-in-the-loop for high-stakes outputs. We design with the assumption that hallucinations will happen — the question is whether they're caught.
Prototype with an eval suite: 2-4 weeks. Production-ready feature with monitoring and cost controls: 6-12 weeks. Full custom-model training pipeline: 12-20 weeks. We don't ship 'AI demos' — everything we deliver has the production scaffolding around it.
Yes — LoRA fine-tuning on Llama/Mistral, full fine-tuning on smaller models, embedding model training for retrieval. But we usually try RAG + a strong prompt first; fine-tuning is the right answer less often than people think.
Provider selection (Azure OpenAI, Anthropic enterprise tier, self-hosted Llama) based on your residency requirements. PII redaction before LLM calls when needed. No data sent to providers without explicit data-processing agreements. SOC 2 / HIPAA / GDPR pipelines where required.

Related Services

Ready to Discuss Your AI & Machine Learning Project?

Tell us what you're building and we'll come back within 24 hours with a fixed-cost plan, timeline, and the team we'd assign to it.

Instant Quote ⚡ Discuss Project Book a Call